Think How to Think: Studying the Relationship between Critical Thinking Skills and Academic Achievement of Learners at Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.305Keywords:
Critical Thinking Skills, Academic Achievement, Linear Regression, Thematic AnalysisAbstract
The purpose of this research was twofold; to identify the relationship between critical thinking skills and academic achievement of students and explore the teachers’ perceptions of students’ critical thinking skills in higher education. Both quantitative and qualitative methodologies were adopted to collect data from university students and teachers. A public sector university was involved through purposive sampling to collect data from teachers and students. A test was developed for students based on the literature on critical thinking skills. Academic achievement was measured through the CGPA of students. A total of 800 students appeared in the test. Simple linear regression was applied to map the relationship between students' critical thinking skills and academic achievement. To collect data from teachers, a semi-structured interview protocol was developed in line with the test content. In total, 20 teachers were involved in collecting data. Thematic analysis was carried out to analyze qualitative data. The results of linear regression showed that there was no relationship between critical thinking skills and the academic achievement of students. They mainly reported their teaching methods and strategies. They rated a moderate level of critical thinking skills of their students. These results were contrasted with available research in higher education.
References
Agarwal, P. K. (2019). Retrieval practice & Bloom’s taxonomy: Do students need fact knowledge before higher order learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000282
Akbayir, K., & Topçul, İ. (2021). The effect of middle school students' Metacognitive awareness and logical thinking skills on success in mathematics course. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.02.272
Albrecht, K. (1984). Brain Building: Easy Games to Develop Your Problem-solving Skills. Prentice Hall.
Aminah, M., Kusumah, Y. S., Suryadi, D., & Sumarmo, U. (2018). The Effect of Metacognitive Teaching and Mathematical Prior Knowledge on Mathematical Logical Thinking Ability and Self-Regulated Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1134a
Awan, A. G., & Hussain, S. F. (2020). The Role of Quality Education in sustainable development of Pakistan. Global Journal of Management, Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(2), 293-319.
Baronett, S. (2018). Logic. Oxford University Press, USA.
Boss, J. (2010). Think : critical thinking and logic skills for everyday life. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB13203737
Budsankom, P., Sawangboon, T., Damrongpanit, S., & Chuensirimongkol, J. (2015). Factors Affecting Higher Order Thinking Skills of Students: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Study. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(19), 2639-2652. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.
Copi, I. M., Cohen, C., & McMahon, K. (2016). Introduction to Logic. Routledge.
Cottrell, S. (2011). Critical Thinking Skills: Developing Effective Analysis and Argument. Palgrave Macmillan.
Facione, P. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report
Forawi, S. (2016b). Standard-based science education and critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.02.005
Foresman, G. A., Fosl, P. S., & Watson, J. C. (2016). The Critical Thinking Toolkit. John Wiley & Sons.
Gensler, H. (2010). Introduction to Logic. Routledge, London.
Haq, A. U., Mahmood, S., Shabbir, M., & Batool, Z. (2020). Assessing the academic integrity among university students in Pakistan. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 6(3), 1025-1032. https://doi.org/10.26710/jbsee.v6i3.1359
Hasnor, H. N., Ahmad, Z., & Nordin, N. (2013). The relationship between learning approaches and academic achievement among Intec students, Uitm Shah Alam. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 178-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.080
Iqbal, J., & Ahmad, A. (2015). Effect of extensive rote learning experience on subsequent academic achievement. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 65(4), 510-514. https://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/998
Kallet, M. (2014). Think smarter: critical thinking to improve problem-solving and decision-making skills. John Wiley & Sons.
Loftus, G. R., & Loftus, E. F. (2018). Human Memory: The Processing of Information. New London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mainali, B. P. (2013). Higher order thinking in education. Academic Voices: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2, 5-10. https://doi.org/10.3126/av.v2i1.8277
Quintana, R., & Correnti, R. (2018). The right to Argue: Teaching and assessing everyday argumentation skills. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(8), 1133-1151. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2018.1450967
Rashid, S., & Qaisar, S. (2017). Role Play: A Productive Teaching Strategy to Promote Critical Thinking. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(2), 197-213.
Riyanti, H., Suciati, S., & Karyanto, P. (2018). Enhancing students’ logical-thinking ability in natural science learning with generative learning model. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 10(3), 648-654. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v10i3.16612
Sani, R. A. (2019). Pembelajaran Berbasis HOTS Edisi Revisi: Higher Order Thinking Skills. Tira Smart.
Schraw, G. J., Robinson, D. R., & Robinson, D. H. (2011). Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills. Information Age Publishing.
Shukla, D., & Dungsungnoen, A. P. (2016). Student's Perceived Level and Teachers' Teaching Strategies of Higher Order Thinking Skills: A Study on Higher Educational Institutions in Thailand. Journal of education and Practice, 7(12), 211-219.
Spicer, D. B., Thompson, K., Tong, M. S., Cowan, T. M., Fulton, T. B., & Lindsley, J. E. (2019). Medical Biochemistry Without Rote Memorization: Multi-Institution Implementation and Student Perceptions of a Nationally Standardized Metabolic Map for Learning and Assessment. Medical Science Educator, 29(1), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-00631-y
Stadler, M., Becker, N., Schult, J., Niepel, C., Spinath, F. M., Sparfeldt, J. R., & Greiff, S. (2018). The logic of success: The relation between complex problem-solving skills and university achievement. Higher Education, 76, 1-15.
Sternberg, R. (2011). Cognitive psychology. Cengage Learning.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2010). Are Asian international medical students just rote learners?. Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 15(3), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9203-1
Tian, H., & Sun, Z. (2018). Academic Achievement Assessment. Springer.
Tikhonova, E., Kudinova, N. (2015). Sophisticated thinking: lower order thinking skills. Tira Smart.
Tuna, A. P. D. A., Biber, A. Ç., & İncikapı, L. (2013). An analysis of mathematics teacher candidates’ logical thinking levels: Case of Turkey. Journal of Educational Instructional Studies, 3(1), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v9i3.7884
Zalaghi, H., & Khazaei, M. (2016). The Role of Deductive and Inductive Reasoning in Accounting Research and Standard Setting. Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 8(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v8i1.8148
Zia, A., & Dar, U. F. (2019). Critical Thinking: Perception and disposition of students in a Medical College of Pakistan. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 69(7), 968–972.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s). Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
SSR's Editorial Board shares the vision of providing free access to information, education, and science for everyone, thus promoting its content through an OPEN ACCESS POLICY, fulfilling the DOAJ definition of open access. The JSSR adheres to an Open Access and Copyright Licensing Policy based on the belief that making research freely accessible to the public promotes greater global knowledge sharing.
The JSSR uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The authors who apply and publish in JSSR consent to abide by the copyright policy set out in the Creative Commons 4.0 license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license).
- Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s).
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
While "By 'open access' to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself."
