Epistemic Modal Verbs in the Field of Linguistics and Literature: A Corpus-Based Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.310Keywords:
Modal Verbs, Epistemic Modality, Corpus-based, Linguistics, LiteratureAbstract
Epistemic modality, a linguistic category, particularly deals with the interactive dimensions of various discourses. Epistemic modality in broad terms can be defined as any modal system that indicates the degree of assurance of what a speaker says. The present study identifies and analyzes the epistemic modal verbs EMVs in the dissertations of linguistics and literature. For this purpose, two sub-corpora of Ph.D. dissertations from the fields of linguistics and literature were constructed. The concordance tool AntConc3.5.8 was used to analyse the selected modal verbs. The most frequent epistemic modal auxiliaries used in both disciplines were found to be may, would and could. Interestingly, the EMVs were deployed by the researchers of linguistics more than twice as much used by the researchers of literature.
References
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman: London.
Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
Collins, P. (2009) Modals and quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Fløttum, K. (2007). Language and Discipline Perspectives on Academic Discourse. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2ndedn.), London: Edward Arnold.
Hyland, K (2005b). Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (1998a). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
Hyland, K. (2009a) Academic discourse. London: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K. (2017). English in the disciplines: Arguments for specificity. ESP Today, 5(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2017.5.1.1
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McEnery, T. and Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McEnery, T., Xiao, R. and Tono, Y. (2006).Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
Ngula, R. S. (2015). Epistemic modality in social science research articles written by Ghanaian authors: A corpus-based study of disciplinary and native vs. non-native variations. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Lancaster University.
Nordberg, T. (2010). Modality as portrayed in Finish upper secondary school EFL textbooks: A corpus-based approach. Unpublished Master Thesis. University of Helsinki. Available in: https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/19357
Nuyts, J. (2000). Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization. Amsterdam- Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Vold, E. T. (2006). Epistemic modality markers in research articles: A cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 61-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00106.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s). Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
SSR's Editorial Board shares the vision of providing free access to information, education, and science for everyone, thus promoting its content through an OPEN ACCESS POLICY, fulfilling the DOAJ definition of open access. The JSSR adheres to an Open Access and Copyright Licensing Policy based on the belief that making research freely accessible to the public promotes greater global knowledge sharing.
The JSSR uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The authors who apply and publish in JSSR consent to abide by the copyright policy set out in the Creative Commons 4.0 license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license).
- Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s).
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
While "By 'open access' to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself."
