Analyses of Past and Future Initiatives in the Kashmir Disputes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i4.394Keywords:
Post-Independence Resolution, UN, Pakistan, India, Kashmir Conflict, Humanitarian Concerns, DisputeAbstract
This article meticulously examines the historical, present, and future dimensions of the Kashmir disputes, encompassing key aspects such as historical initiatives, challenges faced, recent developments, and future prospects. It delves into the complexities of political obstacles, regional and global influences, and the profound impact on the Kashmiri people. After scrutinizing attempts post-independence and international involvement, the article confronts major setbacks, emphasizing the role of intransigence in impeding resolutions. The evolving dynamics and current state of the Kashmir dispute are explored, providing a nuanced understanding of the region. Drawing from historical analyses, the article extracts crucial lessons and offers insights into future initiatives, underscoring the significance of international community engagement for bilateral diplomatic efforts. Humanitarian concerns take center stage, emphasizing the necessity to address the grievances and protect the rights of the Kashmiri people. The article concludes by presenting future scenarios, ranging from best to worst-case possibilities, encouraging a holistic understanding of potential outcomes. This comprehensive analysis serves as a valuable resource for policymakers, academics, and stakeholders invested in fostering a peaceful resolution to the enduring Kashmir conflict.
References
Abb, P. (2022). All geopolitics is local: the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor amidst overlapping center–periphery relations. Third World Quarterly, 44(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2128329
Ahmad, S. (2023). Track two Diplomacy between India and Pakistan. Routledge Studies in South Asian Politics.
Ali, M. (1972). THE SIMLA AND TASHKENT AGREEMENTS. Pakistan Horizon, 25(3), 53–74. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41403845
Bakshi, K. N., & Indian Foreign Affairs Journal. (2007). Simla Agreement (1972): From Military Victory to A Diplomatic Defeat? Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, 2(3), 105–119. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45340665
Balcerowicz, P., & Kuszewska, A. (2021). Human rights in South Asia: Kashmir and the Policies of India and Pakistan. Routledge.
Balcerowicz, P., & Kuszewska, A. (2022). Law and Conflict Resolution in Kashmir. Routledge Studies in South Asian Politics.
Dorsey, James M. 2019. ‘Diverging Gulf Responses to Kashmir and Xinjiang Reflect Deep Divisions.’ Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies website, 25 September. besacenter.org/perspectives-papers/gulf-states-kashmir-xinjiang.
Duschinski, H., & Ghosh, S. N. (2017). Constituting the occupation: preventive detention and permanent emergency in Kashmir. Journal of Legal Pluralism, 49(3), 314–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2017.1347850
Gojree, M. U. (2015). The U.S. Interests and Policies towards South Asia: From Cold War Era to Strategic Rebalancing. Research Journal of Language, Literature, and Humanities, 2(4), 5-12.
Gupta, A. (2021). The Story of Jammu and Kashmir and Interpretation of Article 370 of the Constitution of India. Global Journal of HUMAN-SOCIAL SCIENCE: A Arts & Humanities – Psychology, 21(15), 19. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4510130
Hussain, S. R. (2009). Resolving the Kashmir Dispute: Blending Realism with Justice. The Pakistan Development Review, 48(4), 1007–1035. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41261362
Khan, B. M. I. (2019, December 24). Kashmir crisis 2019: Between a rock and a hard place. www.bbc.com. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-50826419
St John, A. W. (1997). Third-party mediation over Kashmir: A modest proposal. International Peacekeeping, 4(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533319708413689
Westcott, S. P. (2020, May 29). The case of UN involvement in Jammu and Kashmir. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2020/05/29/the-case-of-un-involvement-in-jammu-and-kashmir/
Wojczewski, T. (2014). The Persistency of the India–Pakistan Conflict: Chances and Obstacles of the Bilateral Composite Dialogue. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 1(3), 319–346. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48602108
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s). Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
SSR's Editorial Board shares the vision of providing free access to information, education, and science for everyone, thus promoting its content through an OPEN ACCESS POLICY, fulfilling the DOAJ definition of open access. The JSSR adheres to an Open Access and Copyright Licensing Policy based on the belief that making research freely accessible to the public promotes greater global knowledge sharing.
The JSSR uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The authors who apply and publish in JSSR consent to abide by the copyright policy set out in the Creative Commons 4.0 license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license).
- Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s).
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
While "By 'open access' to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself."
