The Dilemma of Free Speech: Confrontations and Restrictions in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v4i1.399Keywords:
Pakistan, Freedom of Expression, Challenges, Legal Constraints, Societal Attitudes, Political Dynamics, Civil SocietyAbstract
In Pakistan, the pursuit of freedom of expression encounters a complex landscape marked by aspirations for an open society and significant challenges and restrictions. This article explores the multifaceted dilemma of free speech in Pakistan, addressing the tensions between individual liberties, societal norms, political interests, and security concerns. Legal constraints, particularly blasphemy laws and defamation statutes, hinder free expression, while political dynamics, including authoritarian governance and the influence of religious extremism, exacerbate confrontations and restrictions. Journalists face threats and harassment, and the digital sphere is subject to increased censorship. Societal attitudes rooted in religious conservatism, honor culture, and patriarchal structures perpetuate self-censorship and conformity. Despite these challenges, voices of resistance persist, including civil society organizations and human rights activists advocating for pluralism and accountability. The research aims to analyze the legal, political, social, and cultural factors shaping the dilemma of free speech in Pakistan, highlighting the need to address root causes, foster dialogue, and promote tolerance for progress towards a more open and inclusive society.
References
Asad, T. (2013). Free speech, blasphemy, and secular criticism. Is Critique Secular?, 14-52. https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823251681.003.0002
Ayala, M. I., & Murga, A. L. (2016). Patriarchy and women's multidimensional agency: A case study of a Mexican sending village. Women's Studies International Forum, 59, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2016.08.002
Beall, M. L. (1987). Censorship and self‐censorship: A problem in the schools. Communication Education, 36(4), 313-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528709378682
Berkowitz, D., & Limor, Y. (2003). Professional confidence and situational ethics: Assessing the social-professional dialectic in journalistic ethics decisions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(4), 783-801. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000403
Flew, T., & Iosifidis, P. (2020). Special issue editorial: Populism, globalization and social media. International Communication Gazette, 82(1), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519880718
Iosifidis, P., & Andrews, L. (2019). Regulating the Internet intermediaries in a post-truth world: Beyond media policy? International Communication Gazette, 82(3), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519828595
Iram, A., Shahid, R., & Shams, M. (2022). Freedom of expression under censorship in democratic Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 04(04), 809-819. https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v4i04.895 .
Jamil, S. (2020). Journalism for sustainable development: The imperative of journalists’ rights to freedom of expression and access to information for promoting sustainable development in Pakistan. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 9(3), 271-291. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00016_1
Jang, W. Y., & Chon, B. S. (2003). Reflections on the effects of globalization on local tradition. Journal of International Communication, 9(1), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2003.9751945
Khalid, R. (2019). Civil Society and Free Speech in Pakistan: Challenges and Prospects. Asian Journal of Political Science, 27(1), 123-141.
Murugan, P. (2021). Freedom of expression and values. Text Wars, 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199499076.003.0017
Recuber, T. (2021). Race, racism, and mnemonic freedom in the digital afterlife. Information, Communication & Society, 24(5), 684-699. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.1874474
Riaz, S. (2020). Freedom of expression and the criminalization of online glorification of an offense: A case study of Pakistan. https://doi.org/10.5204/thesis.eprints.200252
Sharif, H. S., & Kataria, J. R. (2019). Freedom of Expression and Justiciability in Pakistan. A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 34(1), 185-193.
Zamora Bonilla, J. P. (2006). Rhetoric, induction, and the free speech dilemma. Philosophy of Science, 73(2), 175-193. https://doi.org/10.1086/510817
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s). Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
SSR's Editorial Board shares the vision of providing free access to information, education, and science for everyone, thus promoting its content through an OPEN ACCESS POLICY, fulfilling the DOAJ definition of open access. The JSSR adheres to an Open Access and Copyright Licensing Policy based on the belief that making research freely accessible to the public promotes greater global knowledge sharing.
The JSSR uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The authors who apply and publish in JSSR consent to abide by the copyright policy set out in the Creative Commons 4.0 license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license).
- Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s).
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
While "By 'open access' to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself."
