Investment Law and the Right to Regulate Public Health and Environmental Protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v4i4.422Keywords:
Arbitration, Bilateral Investment Treaties, Environmental Governance, Expropriation, Public Policy, Regulatory Autonomy, Sustainable DevelopmentAbstract
This article explores the tension between investment law protections and a state’s right to regulate public health and environmental protection. International investment agreements (IIAs) provide strong protections for foreign investors, often limiting host states’ regulatory freedoms. This dynamic can create challenges when states seek to implement policies for public welfare that may impact foreign investments. The study examines case law, such as Philip Morris v. Uruguay and Vattenfall v. Germany, to highlight conflicts between investor rights and regulatory measures. Through a review of recent treaties, including the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), the article identifies emerging mechanisms like explicit right-to-regulate clauses, carve-outs, and interpretive guidelines designed to balance investment protection with the public interest. The results indicate that some protections are provided by new treaty provisions, but interpretive flexibility and a lack of automaticity in procedural aspects of arbitration can create as-yet unresolved challenges. It recommends that investment law reforms go further and focus on placing the public interest at the heart of investment law, establishing an architecture supportive of sustainable development, and enabling states to respond to pressing health and environmental problems without running the risk of investor claims.
References
Amjad, S., Khan, A., & Usman, M. (2022). Analyzing International Environmental Law in Addressing Air Pollution. Asian Social Studies and Applied Research (ASSAR), 3(01), 272-283. https://a/asarcouncil.com/papers/1702121061.pdf
Amjad, S., Usman, M., & Khan, A. (2022). Environmental Jurisprudence in Pakistan: A Comprehensive Analysis of National Laws, Judicial Role, and Legislative Instruments Impacting Air Quality and Public Health.
Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2015). The evolution of Fintech: A new post-crisis paradigm. Geo. J. Int'l L., 47, 1271. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676553
Chorus, I., & Welker, M. (2021). Toxic cyanobacteria in water: a guide to their public health consequences, monitoring and management (p. 858). Taylor & Francis.
Clark, M. A., Springmann, M., Hill, J., & Tilman, D. (2019). Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(46), 23357–23362. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906908116
Cleverley, W. O., Cleverley, J. O., & Parks, A. V. (2023). Essentials of health care finance. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012). Principles of International Investment Law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Dolzer, R., Kriebaum, U., & Schreuer, C. (2022). Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
Eckelman, M. J., & Sherman, J. (2016). Environmental impacts of the U.S. health care system and effects on public health. PloS One, 11(6), e0157014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157014
Gostin, L. O., Monahan, J. T., Kaldor, J., DeBartolo, M., Friedman, E. A., Gottschalk, K., Kim, S. C., Alwan, A., Binagwaho, A., Burci, G. L., Cabal, L., DeLand, K., Evans, T. G., Goosby, E., Hossain, S., Koh, H., Ooms, G., Roses Periago, M., Uprimny, R., & Yamin, A. E. (2019). The legal determinants of health: harnessing the power of law for global health and sustainable development. Lancet, 393(10183), 1857–1910. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30233-8
Grossman, M. (2017). On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. In Determinants of health: An economic perspective (pp. 6–41). Columbia University Press.
Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2017). The end of history for corporate law. In Corporate governance (pp. 49-78). Gower.
Howse, R., & Kim, R. (2021). Environmental Governance in International Investment Law. Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, L., & Sachs, L. (2017). The evolution of investment treaties: Recent developments in the right to regulate. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 18(5), 748–764.
Khan, A. (2023). Rules on Digital Trade in the Light of WTO Agreements [PhD Law Dissertation]. School of Law, Zhengzhou University China.
Khan, A., Amjad, S., & Usman, M. (2020). The Evolution of Human Rights Law in the Age of Globalization. International Review of Social Sciences, 8(7), 241-248
Khan, A., & Ximei, W. (2022). Digital economy and environmental sustainability: Do information communication and technology (ICT) and economic complexity matter? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912301
Khan, A., Amjad, S., & Usman, M. (2020). The Role of Customary International Law in Contemporary International Relations. International Review of Social Sciences, 8(08), 259-265. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4674859
Khan, A., Usman, M., & Amjad, S. (2020). Enforcing Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: A Global Imperative. International Review of Social Sciences (IRSS), 8(09), 309-314. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4659160
Khan, A., Usman, M., & Amjad, S. (2023). The digital age legal revolution: taped's trailblazing influence. International journal of contemporary issues in social sciences, 2(4), 524-535. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4674736
Liao, X., & Shi, X. (roc). (2018). Public appeal, environmental regulation, and green investment: Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 119, 554–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.020
Liu, Y., Wang, A., & Wu, Y. (2021). Environmental regulation and green innovation: Evidence from China’s new environmental protection law. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297(126698), 126698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126698
Masters, R., Anwar, E., Collins, B., Cookson, R., & Capewell, S. (2017). Return on investment of public health interventions: a systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 71(8), 827–834. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-208141
Neumayer, E. (2017). Greening trade and investment: environmental protection without protectionism. Routledge.
Quirico, O. (2023). From Investment Protection to Sustainability (via a Multilateral Investment Court): The EU and a New Universal Model for International Investment Agreements. In The European Union and the Evolving Architectures of International Economic Agreements (pp. 57–73). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Schill, S. W., & Krajewski, M. (2019). Right to regulate, state sovereignty, and international investment law: Toward an integration of public interests. Journal of International Economic Law, 22(4), 627–656.
Schrijver, N. (2020). 2019 aiib Law Lecture: The Rise of Sustainable Development in International Investment Law. In The Role of International Administrative Law at International Organizations (pp. 297-314). Brill Nijhoff.
Shelton, D. (2017). Human rights, environmental rights, and the right to environment. In Environmental rights (pp. 509–544). Routledge.
Tienhaara, K. (2011). Regulatory chill and the threat of arbitration: A view from political science. In P. Muchlinski, F. Ortino, & C. Schreuer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (pp. 606–628). Oxford University Press.
Van Harten, G. (2007). Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law. Oxford University Press
Wu, L., Ma, T., Bian, Y., Li, S., & Yi, Z. (2020). Improvement of regional environmental quality: Government environmental governance and public participation. The Science of the Total Environment, 717(137265), 137265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137265
Zhang, Q., Yu, Z., & Kong, D. (2019). The real effect of legal institutions: Environmental courts and firm environmental protection expenditure. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 98(102254), 102254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102254
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s). Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
SSR's Editorial Board shares the vision of providing free access to information, education, and science for everyone, thus promoting its content through an OPEN ACCESS POLICY, fulfilling the DOAJ definition of open access. The JSSR adheres to an Open Access and Copyright Licensing Policy based on the belief that making research freely accessible to the public promotes greater global knowledge sharing.
The JSSR uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The authors who apply and publish in JSSR consent to abide by the copyright policy set out in the Creative Commons 4.0 license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license).
- Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s).
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
While "By 'open access' to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself."
