A Study of Compound Formation and Semantic Opacity in Punjabi

Authors

  • Isra Irshad
  • Dr. Musarat Yasmin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v5i3.558

Keywords:

Punjabi, Derivational Morphology, Compound Formation, Semantic Opacity

Abstract

This research aims to investigate how Punjabi compounds are formed and in what way the formation of some of these compounds contributes to semantic opacity. This is qualitative research, where data have been analyzed descriptively. The study identifies and categorizes various types of compounds, including endocentric, exocentric, copulative, and verbal compounds. The study reveals that exocentric compounds are formed without the interfixes and follow patterns such as A+N, N+A, N+V, and A+V patterns. Endocentric compounds are found in N+N, A+N, and N+A combinations. These are found with and without interfixes, though compounding with interfixes is noticed as a rare morphological process in Punjabi. Copulative compounds are observed in N+N, A+A, and V+V patterns. These are also formed without the interfixes. Verbal compounds are seen in N+dv and A+dv. Notably, semantic opacity is found in exocentric and copulative compounds. The research underscores a need for detailed work on semantic opacity in Punjabi compounds.

References

Abbi, A. (1992). Reduplication in South Asian languages: An areal, typological and historical study. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.

Baart, J. L. G. (2006). An introduction to syntax and morphology: A guide for field linguists. SIL International.

Bauer, L. (2003). Introducing linguistic morphology (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.

Bauer, L. (2005). Les composés exocentriques de l’anglais. In D. Amiot (Ed.), La composition dans une perspective typologique (pp. 35–47). Arras: Artois Presses Université.

Benczes, R. (2004). On the analysability of English exocentric compounds. Jezekoslovija, 5(1–2).

Bhatia, T. K. (1993). Punjabi: A Cognitive-descriptive Grammar. Routledge.

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Butt, M., & King, T. H. (2006). The status of case. In V. Dayal & A. Mahajan (Eds.), Clause structure in South Asian languages (pp. 153–198). Springer.

Haspelmath, M., & Sims, A. D. (2010). Understanding morphology (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Education.

Islam, R. A. (2011). The morphology of loanwords in Urdu: The Persian, Arabic and English strand (PhD thesis). School of English Literature, Language & Linguistics, Newcastle University.

Kachru, Y. (1980). Aspects of Hindi Grammar. Manohar.

Lieber, R. (2009). Introducing morphology. Cambridge University Press.

Malik, M. (2006). Punjabi machine transliteration. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the ACL (pp. 1137–1144).

Masica, C. P. (1993). The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge University Press.

Plag, I. (2002). Word-formation in English. Cambridge University Press.

Pollatsek, A., & Hyönä, J. (2005). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1–2), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000098

Scalise, S., & Guevara, E. (2006). Exocentric compounding in a typological framework. Lingue e Linguaggio, 5(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1418/23143

Shackle, C. (2003). Punjabi. In G. Cardona & D. Jain (Eds.), The Indo-Aryan Languages (pp. 581–621). Routledge

Sharma, D. (1998). Word Formation in Hindi: A Study of Compounding. Delhi: Bahri Publications.

Versteegh, K. (2001). Linguistic contacts between Arabic and other languages. Arabica, 48(4), 470–508. https://doi.org/10.1163/157005801323163825

Downloads

Published

2025-08-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A Study of Compound Formation and Semantic Opacity in Punjabi. (2025). Journal of Social Sciences Review, 5(3), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v5i3.558