Reconceptualising Justice and Authority: Interpretive Conflicts in The Sultan’s Dilemma by Tawfiq Al-Hakim
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v5i3.576Keywords:
Schema, Authority, Justice, Disruption, Irony, RefreshmentAbstract
This research paper seeks to explore the disruption of conventional schemas of authority and justice in Tawfiq Al-Hakim’s The Sultan’s Dilemma. The study applies Peter Stockwell’s Cognitive Poetics, particularly Schema Theory in order to revisit and reconstruct the already existing schemas related to law, authority, and religion. This research argues that the conscious disruption of already set notions enhances the irony and philosophical depth of the narrative. The core tension emerges when the Sultan, once an enslaved person, finds himself coerced to seek legal authorization for his actions. This scenario creates disruption in the minds of readers, compelling them to reshape their notions of justice, not something rigid, but flexible, constructed by society, and rich in diverse interpretations. The research uses qualitative research methodology grounded in close reading and textual analysis and divulges how the language and structure of the play challenge the readers’ anticipations, forcing them to consider the multiple layered meanings. The pre-existing schemas are disrupted by adding the new information, wich become the source of their reconfiguration. This study concludes that schema disruptions in The Sultan’s Dilemma interrogate fixed conceptions of authority and justice, making readers to critically reassess societal norms through irony and cognitive reflection.
References
Damtew, B. (2018, December). Justice in research: History, principle and application (a literature review). In 2018 Conference proceedings on Ethics in Conducting Health Systems Research.
Foss, K., & Foss, N. J. (2002). Authority in the context of distributed knowledge. DRUID - Danish Research Unit
Gready, P. (2005). Analysis: Reconceptualising transitional justice: embedded and distanced justice. Conflict, Security & Development, 5(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678800500103218
Hassan, E. L. (2005). Between comedy and tragedy The Grotesque in Tawfiq al-hakim’s ‘The Sultan’s Dilemma’. The Performance of The comic in arabic TheaTre cultural heritage, Western models and Postcolonial hybridity, 231.
Hurlbert, M., & Mulvale, J. P. (2011). Defining justice. Margot Hurlbert.
Ihidero, V. O. (2018). Religion, Politics and The Metaphor of North-Africa in Tewfiq Al-Hakim’s The Sultan’s Dilemma and Fate of A Cockroach. The CRAB: Journal of Theatre and Media Arts, 13(1), 29-49. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/crab/article/view/271666
Ismael, K. (2010). Islam and the Concept of Justice . https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/32047/1/32047.pdf
Kelly, E., & Rawls, J. (2001). A Theory of Justice. The Philosophical Review, 110(3), 421. https://doi.org/10.2307/2693651
Muhi, M. T. (2021). Bewilderment between might and right: Tawfiq al-Hakim’s The Sultan’s Dilemma (Al-Sulṭan al-Ḥāʾir). AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, 5(4), 17–26. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3964249
Parnami, K. (2019). Concept of justice difficulties in defining justice. Int'l JL Mgmt. & Human., 2, 80.
Rahman, S. R., Rasheed, L. A., & Hammoudi, Z. S. (2020). The representation of the judicial conflict between the law and power in Tawfiq Al-Hakim’s The Sultan’s Dilemma. PalArch’s. Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(3), 12–24.
Renwick, A., & Swinburn, I. (1992). Power and authority. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/25561
Solomon, R. (2023). Literary drama and leadership: A study of The Sultan’s Dilemma by Twafiq al-Hakim. Nigerian Journal of Arts and Humanities, 3(1).
Stockwell, P. (1999). Towards a critical cognitive linguistics. Discourses of war and conflict, 510-528.
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. Routledge.
Stockwell, P. (2007). Cognitive Poetics and Literary Theory. Journal of Literary Theory, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt.2007.008
Williams, J. G. (1968). The Concept of Authority. Journal of Educational Administration, 6(2), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009625
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s). Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
SSR's Editorial Board shares the vision of providing free access to information, education, and science for everyone, thus promoting its content through an OPEN ACCESS POLICY, fulfilling the DOAJ definition of open access. The JSSR adheres to an Open Access and Copyright Licensing Policy based on the belief that making research freely accessible to the public promotes greater global knowledge sharing.
The JSSR uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The authors who apply and publish in JSSR consent to abide by the copyright policy set out in the Creative Commons 4.0 license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license).
- Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s).
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
While "By 'open access' to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself."
