Is the UK Constitution Really a Secular?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v5i3.633Keywords:
Religion, Constitution, Separation, Church, Monarch, Bishop, ParliamentAbstract
It is interesting to note that the British society, which bears a symbol of secularism, owns an uncodified constitution that possesses significant religious characteristics, pertaining not only to a particular religion (Christianity) but also to a particular denomination (protestant). These constitutionally evolved religious features are generally neglected in the British constitutional discourse and debates for the reason that the British constitution is presumed to be a secular constitution whereas the facts state otherwise as it bears several significant historical statutes which mark its religious relevance. Moreover, such a presumed impression of constitutional secularism of the UK tends to be generally misleading various circles and quarters of the Pakistani society; which may potentially result into a motivation for socio-political campaigns in Pakistan for the same pursuit based on the misunderstood constitutional position of the UK. Thus, this article attempts to highlight those significant religious documents, Acts and conventions which provide ample evidence that the UK constitution is not a secular constitution for several reasons such as its historical recognition for deep-rooted nexus between the constitutional monarchy, Parliament and Established Church of England and Scotland. In addition, the legal framework of the UK also contains strong and significant religious representations in all the three military forces, state-funded schools and prisons across the UK.
References
Act of Settlement, 1701, 12 & 13 Will. 3. c. 2 (1701). https://share.google/DNUpDnMLvltsI0fHq
Act of Supremacy, 1534, 26 Hen. 8. c.1 (1534). https://share.google/HaebFdo1nnbhhvD07
Act of Supremacy, 1558, 1 Eliz. 1. c. 1 (1558). https://share.google/ZGxwwng0shWbAt0Mj
Act of Union, 1535, 27 Hen. 8 c. 26 (1536). https://share.google/JHlfG2fNSgwhqE9JI
Act of Union, 1542, 34 & 35 Hen. 8. c. 26 (1542). https://share.google/RhrqAqPOFi3Eqr6jv
Act of Union, 1707, c. 7 (1707). https://share.google/tOj1u957kIVhrvD4r
Act of Union, 1800, 39 & 40 Geo. 3 c. 67 (1800). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aip/Geo3/40/38
Anglo-Irish Treaty, 1921, Treaty Series No. 214 (1921). https://share.google/SyXSfBknLNOewSV8X
Army Chaplains Act, 1868, 31 & 32 Vict. c. 83 (1868). https://share.google/pAPPN2VnCsTV9aG8g
Chaplin v. Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (2010), ET/1702886/09 (Employment Tribunal).
Charities Act, 2011, c. 25 (2011). https://share.google/JpSqIaXvpTHu56H47
Church of England Assembly (Powers) Act, 1919, c. 76 (1919). https://share.google/WedjWvZn2rNgsBsJl
Davies M. (2012). England says ‘no’ to women as bishops. Episcopal News Service.
Education Act, 2002, c.32 (2002). https://share.google/rqHCpF0IMxQGJnuyI
Equality Act, 2010, c. 15 (2010). https://share.google/7HkTUw1QJqAmzZYeL
Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom, Applications Nos. 48420/10, 59842/10, 51671/10, and 36516/10, European Court of Human Rights (15 January 2013).
Government of Ireland Act, 1920, 10 & 11 Geo. 5 c. 67 (1920). https://share.google/l9HNPxctTCj9tdkFC
Human Rights Act, 1998, c. 42 (1998). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42
James L. & Hazell R. (2024). What is Constitutional Monarchy and What is its Role in the UK? Constitution Unit Briefing. UCL Social and Historical Sciences Publications.
Ladele v London Borough of Islington, (2009) EWCA Civ 1357 (Eng CA).
Life Peerages Act, 1958, 6 & 7 Eliz. 2. c. 21 (1958). https://share.google/JX0RFWixKPSaz7yX6
Papal Jurisdiction Act, 1560, c. 2 (1560). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aosp/1560/2
Percy (AP) v. Church of Scotland Board of National Mission (2005) United Kingdom House of Lords 73, (2006) 2 AC 28.
Republic of Ireland Act, 1948, Act No. 22 (1948). https://share.google/1aQjDuHT6YTa1GFh1
School Standards and Framework Act, 1998, c.31 (1998). https://share.google/ZsaBwjhaFPi974RaD
Succession to the Crown Act, 2013, c. 20 (2013). https://share.google/SlCTwIdQhOR7OVrpt
Survey (2024). British Social Attitudes.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s). Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
JSSR's Editorial Board shares the vision of providing free access to information, education, and science for everyone, thus promoting its content through an OPEN ACCESS POLICY, fulfilling the DOAJ definition of open access. The JSSR adheres to an Open Access and Copyright Licensing Policy based on the belief that making research freely accessible to the public promotes greater global knowledge sharing.
The JSSR uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The authors who apply and publish in JSSR consent to abide by the copyright policy set out in the Creative Commons 4.0 license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license).
- Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s).
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
While "By 'open access' to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself."


