Students’ Motivation and Attitude towards the Choice of Computer Science as a Subject at Secondary School Level

Authors

  • Dr. Asma Khizar Assistant Professor, Institute of Education, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Muhammad Nadeem Anwar Associate Professor, Institute of Education, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Hafiz Muhammad Salman Naveed PhD Scholar, Department of Education. University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Ghulam Zainab Lecturer, Institute of Education, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v4i4.645

Keywords:

Students’ Motivation, Attitude, Choice of Computer Science, Subject

Abstract

The study aimed at identifying the connection between motivation and attitude of students towards computer science and also identifying the differences in gender with regard to motivation and attitude towards the choice of computer science as a subject. Research was descriptive—a sample population of 300 (150 males and 150 females) secondary school pupils. The attitude and motivation towards computer science of students were measured by a self-developed questionnaire. The results showed that there was a significant positive correlation between the motivation of the students and their attitude toward the choice of computer science as a subject. The analyses based on genders showed that male students had a slightly higher attitude and even motivation than their female counterparts.  The results emphasized the need to create positive attitudes and motivation in students in order to increase their interest and attention to computer science. Moreover, the existing differences in gender in relation to attitudes and motivation indicate that both interventions and specific strategies should be implemented to facilitate the creation of equal opportunities and address the motivation of male and female students.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–146). W. H. Freeman.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Guzdial, M., & Forte, A. (2005). Design process for a non-major computing course. Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1145/1047344.1047464

Iqbal, W., Farooq, U., & Alam, A. (2022). Challenges in teaching computer science in public secondary schools: Pakistani context. Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences, 2(4), 45–60.

Koh, N. K. & Ng, C. H. (2019). Curating a technology-rich authentic learning environment (TALE) using a mobile app.

Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT Press.

Papastergiou, M. (2008). Are computer science and information technology still masculine fields? High school students’ perceptions and career choices. Computers & Education, 51(2), 594–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.009

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.

Rana, R. A. (2012). Effect of computer studies on students’ academic achievement at secondary school level in Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(6), 106–113.

Rana, R. A., & Mahmood, N. (2010). The relationship between students’ attitudes toward computer studies and achievement at secondary level in Pakistan. Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 27–40.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). Differentiation of instruction in the elementary grades. ERIC Digest.

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C., & Vallières, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6

Yousuf, M. I., & Sajjad, S. (2011). Effectiveness of computer education at secondary school level in Pakistan. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 44–53.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Students’ Motivation and Attitude towards the Choice of Computer Science as a Subject at Secondary School Level. (2024). Journal of Social Sciences Review, 4(4), 300-305. https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v4i4.645