Artificial Intelligence as a Catalyst and Constraint for Critical Thinking Development: Examining Perceptions, Benefits, and Limitations among Social Work Students

Authors

  • Abbas Ahmed Master of Social Work, Excelsia University College, Sydney, Australia.
  • Aatika Abbas M.Phil. IR, Department of International Relation, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Imran Haider Secondary School Teacher, School Education Department, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v6i2.750

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Critical Thinking, Higher Education, Social Work Education, ChatGPT, Student Perceptions, Generative AI

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized higher education by affecting student access to information, knowledge building, and learning activities. Although critical thinking was no longer a basic requirement in academic learning and professional practice, it was still a core component of social work education where ethical judgments, reflection and evidence-based decision making had been crucially important. While personalised learning, feedback and reflective practice had been possible with the use of AI tools like ChatGPT and Grammarly, questions about academic integrity, dependency, privacy, and independent thinking have persisted. The link between Artificial Intelligence and critical thinking had been examined from the social work higher education students' viewpoint. This specific qualitative case study design had been used in analyzing the experiences of first year Master of Social Work students at the Excelsia University College. Five students who had experience of using AI applications had been involved in semi-structured interviews and data had been analysed using thematic analysis in the way proposed by Braun and Clarke. The results had shown that both students and instructors have perceived AI as a helpful learning tool, which improved learning efficiency, academic writing, idea organisation and reflective thinking. But challenges around AI dependency, creativity, accuracy, bias, academic integrity had also been raised by participants. The study had highlighted the importance of responsible AI literacy frameworks to ensure ethical technology use and maintain the human element of reasoning and professional judgment.

Author Biography

  • Abbas Ahmed, Master of Social Work, Excelsia University College, Sydney, Australia.

    Corresponding Author: abbas.awan581@gmail.com

References

Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063

Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching critical thinking skills: Literature review. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 21–39. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1239945

Asakura, K., Occhiuto, K., Todd, S., Leithead, C., & Clapperton, R. (2020). A call to action on artificial intelligence and social work education: Lessons learned from a simulation project using natural language processing. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 40(5), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2020.1813234

Bezanilla, M. J., Fernández-Nogueira, D., Poblete, M., & Galindo-Domínguez, H. (2019). Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher’s view. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584

Darwin, D., Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2290342. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Formosa, P. (2021). Robot autonomy vs. human autonomy: Social robots, artificial intelligence (AI), and the nature of autonomy. Minds and Machines, 31(4), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09579-2

Goldkind, L. (2021). Social work and artificial intelligence: Into the matrix. Social Work, 66(4), 372–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swab028

Halpern, D. F., & Dunn, D. S. (2021). Critical thinking: A model of intelligence for solving real-world problems. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9020022

Hodgson, D., Boddy, J., Watts, L., Goldingay, S., & Nipperess, S. (2022). Problematising artificial intelligence in social work education: Challenges, issues and possibilities. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(4), 1878–1895. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab168

James, P., Lal, J., Liao, A., Magee, L., & Soldatic, K. (2024). Algorithmic decision-making in social work practice and pedagogy: Confronting the competency/critique dilemma. Social Work Education, 43(6), 1552–1569. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2023.2195425

Kamoun, F., El Ayeb, W., Jabari, I., Sifi, S., & Iqbal, F. (2024). Exploring students’ and faculty’s knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions towards ChatGPT: A cross-sectional empirical study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 23, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.28945/5239

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Artificial Intelligence as a Catalyst and Constraint for Critical Thinking Development: Examining Perceptions, Benefits, and Limitations among Social Work Students. (2026). Journal of Social Sciences Review, 6(2), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v6i2.750