Who Deserves Full Membership? Prospective Teachers' Constructions of Citizenship, Personhood, and Disability in Punjab's Initial Teacher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62843/Keywords:
Citizenship Education, Disability Studies, Teacher Education, Personhood, Qualitative Interviews, Punjab, PakistanAbstract
This qualitative research study explores pre-service teachers’ conceptions of citizenship, personhood, and disability in the context of pre-service teacher education in Punjab, Pakistan. Telephonic interviews were conducted with 12 pre-service teachers pursuing teacher-training in Punjab using the semi-structured life-world interview protocol. TurboScribe was used to perform the translation and transcription, and the subsequent analysis was done in NVivo 15 in the form of meaning condensation and thematic coding. The findings provided three themes: (1) conditional citizenship expressed in the form of deficit discourse; (2) disputed personhood expressed in terms of normative expectations; and (3) pedagogical ambivalence expressed in connection with inclusive education. Most pre-service teachers' dominant themes explained disabled students as objects of care, but not as rights-bearing citizens, thus placing the disability beyond the frame of full community membership. The research thus explains why teacher education reproduces the exclusionary ideas of citizenship, thus urging the high-stakes necessity of transformational pedagogical interventions that acknowledge the personhood and democratic participation of disabled students.
References
Anis, F., Waqar, Y., & Muhammad, Y. (2025). Understanding Pakistani elementary school teachers' attitudes toward inclusive education: Development of the teacher inclusion attitude questionnaire. Indus Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.59075/ijss.v3i1.619
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage.
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing interviews (2nd ed.). Sage.
Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Grudnoff, L., Ludlow, L., Haigh, M., & Hill, M. (2014). When complexity theory meets critical realism: A platform for research on initial teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 41(1), 105–122. https://www.jstor.org/stable/teaceducquar.41.1.105
Connell, R. (2020). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Degener, T. (2016). Disability in a human rights context. Laws, 5(3), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5030035
Flores, M. (2020). Feeling like a student but thinking like a teacher: A study of the development of professional identity in initial teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1724659
Florian, L., & Rouse, M. (2009). The inclusive practice project in Scotland: Teacher education for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(4), 594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.003
Goodley, D., & Runswick‐Cole, K. (2016). Becoming dishuman: Thinking about the human through dis/ability. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 37(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.930021
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2019). Provocations for critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 34(6), 972–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889
Grech, S., & Soldatic, K. (Eds.). (2015). Disability and colonialism:(Dis) encounters and anxious intersectionalities. Routledge.
Hodkinson, A. (2023). Key issues in special educational needs, disability and inclusion. Sage.
Kittay, E. F. (2011). The ethics of care, dependence, and disability. Ratio Juris, 24(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x
Kittay, E. F., & Carlson, L. (2010). Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy. John Wiley & Sons.
Kittay, E. F., Jennings, B., & Wasunna, A. A. (2005). Dependency, difference and the global ethic of longterm care. Journal of Political Philosophy, 13(4), 443–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00232.x
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Lister, R. (2007). Inclusive citizenship: Realizing the potential. Citizenship Studies, 11(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020601099856
Marshall, T. H., & Bottomore, T. (1950). Citizenship and social class. Cambridge University Press.
Miles, M. (2002). Community and individual responses to disablement in south asian histories: Old traditions, new myths. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 13(2), 1–16.
Muhammad, Y., & Bokhari, T. B. A., Faisal. (2024). Inclusive education in Pakistani schools: Theoretical perspectives, challenges and opportunities. Pakistan Journal of Law, Analysis and Wisdom, 3(3), 135–145. https://pjlaw.com.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/v3i3-135-145
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & research methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Reeves, P., Ng, S., Harris, M., & Phelan, S. (2020). The exclusionary effects of inclusion today: (re)production of disability in inclusive education settings. Disability & Society, 37(4), 612–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1828042
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Texas Christian University Press.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
Sharma, U., & Sokal, L. (2016). Can teachers’ self-reported efficacy, concerns, and attitudes toward inclusion scores predict their actual inclusive classroom practices? Australasian Journal of Special Education, 40(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/jse.2015.14
Slee, R., & Tomlinson, S. (2018). Inclusive education isn't dead, it just smells funny. Routledge.
Soldatic, K. (2019). Disability and the global south: The neoliberal production of inequality. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(12), 1251–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1602365
Tronto, J. C. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York University Press.
Waqar, Y., Urooj, T., Anis, F., & Muhammad, Y. (2025). Pedagogical, professional, and resource concerns: Understanding pre-service teachers' preparedness for inclusive education implementation. Research Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.59075/rjs.v3i1.59
Watermeyer, B., Mckenzie, J., & Swartz, L. (2019). The palgrave handbook of disability and citizenship in the global South. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74675-3
Westheimer, J., & Ladson-Billings, G. (2024). What kind of citizen?: Educating our children for the common good. Teachers College Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s). Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
JSSR's Editorial Board shares the vision of providing free access to information, education, and science for everyone, thus promoting its content through an OPEN ACCESS POLICY, fulfilling the DOAJ definition of open access. The JSSR adheres to an Open Access and Copyright Licensing Policy based on the belief that making research freely accessible to the public promotes greater global knowledge sharing.
The JSSR uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The authors who apply and publish in JSSR consent to abide by the copyright policy set out in the Creative Commons 4.0 license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license).
- Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s).
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
While "By 'open access' to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself."
