Compliance with International Humanitarian Law IHL) in U.S.–Israel Military Operations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v5i4.667Keywords:
Armed Conflict Regulation, Civilian Protection, Military Assistance, State Responsibility, War CrimesAbstract
This study examines compliance with International Humanitarian Law IHL in U.S.–Israel military operations, focusing on principles of distinction, proportionality, and precaution. Using doctrinal and analytical research methods, it evaluates legal frameworks, state practice, and reported conduct in recent conflicts. The findings indicate partial adherence alongside credible allegations of violations, highlighting gaps between legal obligations and operational realities, and underscoring challenges in accountability and enforcement mechanisms. This research article examines the extent of compliance with IHL in military operations involving the United States and Israel, particularly in the context of recent conflicts in Gaza and the broader Middle East. It evaluates key legal principles such as distinction, proportionality, and precaution, and analyses allegations of violations, the role of U.S. military assistance, and mechanisms of accountability. The study argues that while both states formally commit to IHL norms, significant concerns persist regarding their practical implementation, enforcement, and the politicization of compliance assessments.
References
Ahmed, F. A., Zafar, S., & Gul, S. (2025). Analyzing PECA amendments: Press freedom, democratic values, and digital regulation in Pakistan. Traditional Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 4(01), 41-51.
Alakash, M. A. N., Altaany, H. M., Abuirmilah, B., Shakhatreh, H. J. M., Magableh, N. Z. S., & Moh’d Suleiman Al, A. K. (2024). Enhancing the implementation of international humanitarian law in conflict zones: A comprehensive review. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 16(03).
Corn, G. S., & Smotherman, T. R. (2025). Improving Compliance with International Humanitarian Law in an Era of Maneuver War and Mission Command. SMU L. Rev., 78, 3. https://doi.org/10.25172/smulr.78.1.2
Dannenbaum, T., & Dill, J. (2024). International law in Gaza: Belligerent intent and provisional measures. American Journal of International Law, 118(4), 659-683. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2024.53
Graycar, A., & Jurkiewicz, C. (2023). Accountability mechanisms. In Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 110-114). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Gul, S., Ahmad, R., & Rahman, S. U. (2025). The Myth of Neutrality: Judicial Review, Ideology, and Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan and the United Kingdom. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(2), 1742-1754. https://doi.org/10.59075/mm3m9d48
Gul, S., Allauddin, M., & Ahmad, F. (2025). The Crisis of Statelessness and Refugee Rights in International Law. Indus Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 660-673. https://doi.org/10.59075/ijss.v3i2.1500
Gul, S., Saman, A., & Ahmad, F. (2025). The Convergence of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Recalibrating Legal Boundaries in Contemporary Conflict. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(2), 1391-1403. https://doi.org/10.59075/gs59yx51
Han, Y. (2023). The contribution of evaluation to accountability mechanisms. In Handbook of Public Policy Evaluation (pp. 104-116). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Marshania, L., & Mebagishvili, N. (2025). The US–Israel Security Partnership: Strategic Cooperation in Defense, Intelligence, and Regional Stability. Defence Innovations and International Partnerships: Shaping the Future of Security, 87.
Nabiebu, M., Alobo, E. E., Ijiomah, A. O., & Ipuole, R. O. (2024). The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: Implications for the Principles of Distinction and Self-Defence in International Humanitarian Law. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 7(1), 134-149. https://gnosijournal.com/index.php/gnosi/article/view/255
Richter, E. D., Berry, E. M., & Rivkind, A. I. (2024). International humanitarian law in the Israeli-Gaza conflict. Jama, 331(15), 1329-1330. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.4429
Zabakhidze, I. (2024). Important Aspects of the Strategic Partnership Between Israel and the USA. Journal of Historical Studies, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.54414/JMTY3600
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s). Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
JSSR's Editorial Board shares the vision of providing free access to information, education, and science for everyone, thus promoting its content through an OPEN ACCESS POLICY, fulfilling the DOAJ definition of open access. The JSSR adheres to an Open Access and Copyright Licensing Policy based on the belief that making research freely accessible to the public promotes greater global knowledge sharing.
The JSSR uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The authors who apply and publish in JSSR consent to abide by the copyright policy set out in the Creative Commons 4.0 license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license).
- Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s).
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
While "By 'open access' to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself."
