From Filters to Feelings: A Qualitative Exploration of Self-Image and Emotional Experience among Snapchat Users
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v6i1.688Keywords:
Snapchat Users, Self-image, Emotional ExperiencesAbstract
The qualitative study was conducted with purpose to explore self-image and emotional experiences among Snapchat users. Snapchat launched in 2011 as mobile application stands out as a social media platform which provides distinctive avenue for self-expression. Literature showed influence of Snapchat use on individual’s self-image, perception, psychological and emotional wellbeing and experience. In current research semi-structured interviews were conducted from 15 regular Snapchat Users (N=15). Ten women (n=10) and five men (n=05) between age 18 to 35 were informed and briefed about the purpose of conducting this study. Thematic analysis conducted. Majority of respondents reported that use of this app and applying filters has impact on their self-image while few reported no impact. Similarly participants explored significant emotional experiences by using this app. They reported effect of Snapchat filters use on their mood, confidence, self-esteem and emotional reactions. Subjects also talked about purpose to use this app like spending time, taking snaps with filters, location spy, making streaks with friends, social connections, snap points etc. Respondents explored that use of Snapchat filters raise the beauty standards and also leads to stress. Subjects mentioned about filtered and unfiltered images are different and posting such images can increase their concerns what other might be thinking about them. Participants reported that with time they may lose interest and its responsibility of user to use this app carefully. This study will aim to contribute to the existing literature on exploring self-image and emotional experiences are affected by Snapchat, specifically in Pakistani culture and society.
References
Al-Oudan, H. (2019). The effectiveness of using the “Snapchat” application to produce educational videos and the satisfaction of students at the College of Education at Princess Noura Bint Abdul Rahman University. The Islamic University Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies, 2.
Al-Qahtani, A., Basardah, M. & Al-Shaer A. (2019). The Saudi university youth's use of social networks and the gratifications achieved from them: Snapchat as a model (Doctoral dissertation, Naif Arab University for Security Sciences).
Alamyar, I. H., & Hussain, J. (2024). The semiotics of Snapchat filters: Understanding their influence on user self-presentation. INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication), 9(1), 53–84. https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v9i1.1848
Alghamdi, E. A., & Bogari, N. (2020). The Impact of Social Media Platforms “Instagram” and “Snapchat” on the Purchasing Decision-Structural Equation Modelling Approach: Social Media Platforms. International Journal of Online Marketing (IJOM), 10(1), 72–94.
Alsaggaf, R. M. (2019). Saudi women's identities on Facebook: Context collapse, judgement, and the imagined audience. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 85(2), e12070. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12070
Alsaggaf, R. M. (2021, September). The impact of snapchat beautifying filters on beauty standards and self-image: a self-discrepancy approach. In The European Conference on Arts and Humanities (pp. 47-58).
Barker, J. (2020). Making-up on mobile: The pretty filters and ugly implications of Snapchat. Fashion. Style & Popular Culture, 7(2–3), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1386/fspc_00015_1
Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Falk, E. B. (2016). Sharing the small moments: ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication and Society, 19(7), 956–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2015.1084349
Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (1974). The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratification research. Sage Publications.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brubaker, P. J., & Wilson, C. (2018). Let’s give them something to talk about: Global brands’ use of visual content to drive engagement and build relationships. Public Relations Review, 44(3), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.04.010
Chae, J. (2018). Explaining females’ envy toward social media influencers. Media Psychology, 21(2), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1328312
Choi, L., & Park, M. (2021). Perceived Realism of Snapchat Filters and Their Effects on Beauty Standards. Computers in Human Behavior, 45(6), 789–802. https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.21881111.2021.4
Cwynar-Horta, J. (2016). The commodification of the body positive movement on Instagram. Stream: Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication, 8(2), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.21810/strm.v8i2.203
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior (1985th ed.). Springer.
Eshiet, J. (2020). “Real me versus social media me:” filters, snapchat dysmorphia, and beauty perceptions among young women (Thesis). https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/1101
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations; Studies Towards the Integration of the Social Sciences, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Fox, J., Vendemia, M. A., Smith, M. A., & Brehm, N. R. (2021). Effects of taking selfies on women’s self-objectification, mood, self-esteem, and social aggression toward female peers. Body Image, 36, 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.11.011
Fox, J., Vendemia, M. A., Smith, M. A., & Brehm, N. R. (2021). Effects of taking selfies on women’s self-objectification, mood, self-esteem, and social aggression toward female peers. Body Image, 36, 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.11.011
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206.
Garcia, R. (2018). The Influence of Social Media Filters on Brand Perception. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.35912/joste.v4i2.2099
Gupta, N., & Patel, A. (2018). The Role of Augmented Reality Filters in Redefining Beauty Norms. Journal of Media Studies, 16(3), 301–318.
Habib, A., Ali, T., Nazir, Z., & Mahfooz, A. (2022). Snapchat filters changing young women’s attitudes. Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012), 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104668
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological review, 94(3), 319.
Jalali-Farahani, S., Amiri, P., Zarani, F., & Azizi, F. (2021). The main physical components of body image from the perspectives of Iranian adolescents: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10096-7
Kandathil, C. K., Patel, P. N., Saltychev, M., & Most, S. P. (2020). Differences in social perceptions between digital single lens reflex camera and cell phone selfie images. Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine, 22(5), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2020.0077
Kim, D., & Song, Y. (2021). The Ethical Implications of Beauty Filters: A Critical Analysis. Ethics in Technology and Society, 5(1), 78–92.
Miller, J., & Wilson, E. (2020). The Effects of Snapchat Filters on Social Comparison and Self Esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 189–204.
Nguyen, M. (2019). Snapchat Filters and Consumer Behavior: An Experimental Study. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(4), 511–527.
Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (jay). (2017). Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.041
Ramphul, K., & Mejias, S. G. (2018). Is “Snapchat dysmorphia” a real issue? Cureus, 10(3), e2263. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2263
Reece, A. G., Rees, C. S., & Renshaw, T. L. (2022). The psychological effects of face-altering filters in social media. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.
Smith, A. (2019). The Evolution of Beauty Standards in the Digital Age. Journal of Communication Technology, 15(2), 112–129.
Tropp, J., & Baetzgen, A. (2019). Users’ definition of snapchat usage. Implications for marketing on snapchat. The International Journal on Media Management, 21(2), 130–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2019.1637343
Vogel, E. A., & Rose, J. P. (2016). Self-reflection and interpersonal connection: Making the most of self-presentation on social media. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2(3), 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000076
Wang, S., & Chen, H. (2017). The Impact of Selfies and Filters on Instagram: A Cultural Perspective. Visual Communication Quarterly, 22, 56–73.
Zhao, S., & Zappavigna, M. (2018). The interplay of (semiotic) technologies and genre: the case of the selfie. Social Semiotics, 28(5), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504724
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s). Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
JSSR's Editorial Board shares the vision of providing free access to information, education, and science for everyone, thus promoting its content through an OPEN ACCESS POLICY, fulfilling the DOAJ definition of open access. The JSSR adheres to an Open Access and Copyright Licensing Policy based on the belief that making research freely accessible to the public promotes greater global knowledge sharing.
The JSSR uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The authors who apply and publish in JSSR consent to abide by the copyright policy set out in the Creative Commons 4.0 license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license).
- Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s).
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
While "By 'open access' to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself."
